BornLib's Blog

Life, Liberty, and the Firearms that protect them both

Archive for the ‘Self defense’ Category

Dishonest Solutions

leave a comment »

That’s the title of Colion Noir’s newest and most excellent piece for NRA News:

Advertisements

Written by BornLib

March 26, 2013 at 4:13 pm

Which Country Would You Rather Live In?

leave a comment »

Compare and contrast:

First the UK (and yes, this is the actual headline):

Drunken thug who battered girlfriend in the street making her face ‘explode like an airbag’ walks away with community service despite the fact he was on PROBATION

Then there is the USA:

Marine with concealed carry permit stops man from beating woman

A Marine Corps veteran was able to stop a man early Tuesday, March 12th from nearly kicking a woman to death. It happened near 102nd and Lincoln, and Wisconsin’s concealed carry law made his efforts possible.

Remember this next time some intellectual lightweight says some nonsense such as, “If there were no guns there would be no need for self-defense.”

Written by BornLib

March 19, 2013 at 5:27 pm

That Racist NRA

leave a comment »

Written by BornLib

March 14, 2013 at 6:03 pm

Thought of the Day

leave a comment »

Ma-rooned: Why Do You Need a Gun? You Can Just Call 911…

You are your own first responder. I don’t know why this concept is so hard for people to grasp. No one bats an eye at the thought of having a fire extinguisher in their house – it’s common sense that if a small, manageable fire breaks out, having the tools to quickly and effectively battle that fire handy prevents massive loss later. It certainly doesn’t mean you want to pretend you’re a firefighter. Ditto having a good first aid kit – if something happens, even in the best circumstance help is going to be a few minutes away, and having tools to handle minor medical emergencies is part of a good safety net. It doesn’t you think you’re an EMT or a doctor.

Yet you mention having a firearm for self-defense and all of a sudden you’re a vigilante or a cop wanna-be. I have yet to have anyone on the anti-freedom side explain to me why having a firearm handy in case of a violent encounter is any different than having a fire extinguisher in case of fire or a first aid kit in case of accident. The firearm is a tool for a specific scenario; it is not a magic talisman to prevent violent encounters from happening but to assist you in surviving the encounter with – ideally – minimal injury to yourself.

Why do we treat self-defense as less important than fire safety or first aid?

Or the short version:

gun_3-470x449

Written by BornLib

March 12, 2013 at 7:27 pm

As translated into English by Thomas Jefferson

leave a comment »

The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.

– Cesare Beccaria

Written by BornLib

March 11, 2013 at 7:45 pm

Rape-free zones: They’re not just for Occupy Wall Street anymore

with one comment

Via Ace of Spades HQ: Colorado Lawmaker: Ladies, You Don’t Need a Gun, We Have Rape-Free Zones

“It’s why we have call boxes, it’s why we have safe zones, it’s why we have the whistles. Because you just don’t know who you’re gonna be shooting at. And you don’t know if you feel like you’re gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around or if you feel like you’re in trouble when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop … pop around at somebody.”

Now here is what we already know:

A study compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice, noted that where guns or knives are used for protection by potential rape victims, the rape was completed only three percent of the time as opposed to a completion rate of thirty-two percent for rapes where no guns or knives were used by the victim.

Now these imaginary “safe-zones,” do they cut a woman’s chance of being raped by 90% like weapons do?  How about call boxes?  Whistles? No?

Why is this Democrat advocating alternate behaviors that will lead to more rapes?

Bookworm tears into him quite thoroughly: Dems are troglodytes about women and self-defense, and they’re selling this as a virtue for the next election

Written by BornLib

February 19, 2013 at 7:02 pm

What I wrote to congress today

leave a comment »

Since so many of us seem to be in a sharing mood, here is what I wrote to my senators today:

I oppose S. 33: Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act of 2013 because not only does it go against the spirit of the 2nd Amendment which makes clear an inalienable right of all good citizens, but this proposed legislation runs counter to our core principle of equality.

The citizens, who are the very targets of criminal violence and malice, should not be denied the same tools of self defense employed by law enforcement and other public servants for that very purpose. To do so is to create a rank of second class citizens defined solely by occupation. This has no place in a free, egalitarian and democratic society.

Bitter experience has shown us that capacity bans don’t prevent or mitigate mass shootings. The Rio de Janeiro school shooting made this crystal clear.

In contrast, to the informed, there is no doubt as the the defensive utility of magazines of capacity higher than 10. Over and over we have seen law enforcement overwhelmed by riots and natural disasters, leaving citizens without police protection from violent mobs and gangs. Against such overwhelming force it was the high capacity magazine fed rifle, not the double barreled shotgun, that preserved them.

I wrote it in a way that I hoped would appeal to Brown as well as Portman.

Written by BornLib

February 4, 2013 at 5:20 pm