BornLib's Blog

Life, Liberty, and the Firearms that protect them both

Cincinnati Police Officer Shoots, Kills Knife Wielding Suspect

with 2 comments

Cincinnati Police Officer Shoots, Kills Person in Northside.

A Cincinnati Police officer fired on and killed an older white man who apparently pulled a knife on the officer in Northside early Monday morning.”

Pretty straightforward.

1. Don’t bring a knife to a gunfight.

2. Don’t pull a weapon on a cop.

Someone expressed the following sentiment in the comments,Seems extreme that the officer killed a suspect for pulling a knife; there are other ways to incapacitate from a distance besides killing.”

Ah, armchair law enforcement.

In the February-March 2011 issue of Concealed Carry Magazine, Michael Martin explains the following:

If an attacker lunges at you with a knife, can you draw your firearm in time to stop him? That depends on how close the attacker is. Since attacks are almost always a surprise, we should assume that we’d need 1.2 seconds to perceive and process the fact that we’re under attack, plus the time required to draw our firearm and align it with the attacker. Let’s assume the motor reaction time takes two seconds (the time to orient toward the attacker, and draw our firearm from concealment). That means that our full reaction might take more than three seconds, which is enough time for an attacker to cover more than 50 feet. So the answer to the question is, ‘Are you more than 50 feet away from the attacker?'”

So “from a distance”, in this context, is 50 feet.  What are the effective ranges of non-lethal alternatives that a patrolman would be carrying?

Tazers – According to Taser International, Inc, long range cartridges have a range of 35 feet.  Standard range cartridges range from 15 to 25 feet.

Pepper Spray – DPS markets their X-Stream-range Defense Spray as having an “incredible” range of 20 feet.  Kathy Jackson, author of The Cornered Cat, points out that, “physical effects [of pepper spray] generally begin to occur within five seconds of the time the spray hits…”

That’s it.  If a cop is to get close enough to use non-lethal weapons, assuming they are carrying them, they have to be close enough that they can be easily stabbed.  Making such a demand of a law enforcement officer is simply irresponsible.

Another comment I take issue with, “When will the police learn to shoot and INJURE someone? With all that training why can’t you shoot in the arm, leg or SOMETHING onstead of taking someone’s life?”

1. Police aren’t that well trained to shoot.  Most only shoot enough to pass their twice a year firearms qualifications.  I train more in a month than they do in a year, and that’s nothing compared to a professional shooter.  Expecting cops to be expert marksmen after a couple hours of training is totally unrealistic.

2. This is not the movies.  You are demanding that they hit a target a few inches wide, while it is moving, and the shooter is also likely to be moving, under the stress of a life-threatening situation?  Why don’t you demand they shoot the knife out of his hand while you’re at it?  That is about as reasonable as what you want.

3. Shooting to maim is legally reckless.  A firearm is lethal force.  If you (or a cop) deploys lethal force in the way you describe, it is the legal equivalent to admitting that your life was not in danger.  This means taking away your legal defense for using a firearm to defend yourself from attack.  Since the cop was being menaced by a deadly weapon, such a response could only be described as idiotic.

Written by BornLib

April 18, 2011 at 1:10 pm

Posted in Cops, Lethal Force

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. There are other ways? Such as? Having someone come up behind him and zap the knife-wielder with a stun-gun?
    Knives are the ORIGINAL lethal-force instrument. Cops spend more time in SENSITIVITY training than at the range, so why won’t they learn to be sensitive too? Sheesh.


    April 20, 2011 at 7:03 pm

  2. Shooting to maim would be pretty random even if you could hit an extremity on purpose. There are major blood vessels in the arms and legs, and if you hit them it can be just as lethal. Meanwhile, you can make solid hits to their body and it might not stop them if you don’t actually hit anything vital.

    It’s this kind of thinking that would scare me if I ever did have to use force and it went to trial. People think they know about guns because they see how they work all the time on TV, even though it’s often completely wrong.


    May 1, 2011 at 11:35 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: